355266 работ
представлено на сайте

Реферат The limits of pluralism I the ECHR system, номер: 218712

Номер: 218712
Количество страниц: 16
Автор: marvel
390 руб.
Купить эту работу
Не подошла
данная работа?
Вы можете заказать учебную работу
на любую интересующую вас тему
Заказать новую работу
essay cover The limits of pluralism I the ECHR system , "Table of contents
Introduction 3
1. The limits of pluralism I: the ECHR system 6
2. The limits of pluralism II: the Rel...

Автор:

Дата публикации:

The limits of pluralism I the ECHR system
logo
"Table of contents
Introduction 3
1. The limits of pluralism I: the ECHR system 6
2. The limits of pluralism II: the Rel...
logo
144010, Россия, Московская, Электросталь, ул.Ялагина, д. 15А
Телефон: +7 (926) 348-33-99

StudentEssay

buy КУПИТЬ ЭТУ РАБОТУ.
  • Содержание:
    "Table of contents
    Introduction 3
    1. The limits of pluralism I: the ECHR system 6
    2. The limits of pluralism II: the Relationship of the EU and ECHR politico-legal orders 10
    3. The principle of equal treatment 12
    Conclusion 15
    References 16

    1. Harmsen R. ‘The Transformation of the ECHR Legal Order and the Post-Enlargement Challenges Facing the European Court of Human Rights’, in G Martinico and O Pollicino (eds), The National Judicial Treatment of the ECHR and EU Laws: A Comparative Constitutional Perspective (Groningen, Europe Law Publishing, 2010) 30–32.
    2. Hennette-Vauchez S. ‘Constitutional v International? When Unifi ed Reformatory Rationales Mistmatch the Plural Paths of Legitimacy of ECHR Law’ in J Christoffersen and M Rask Madsen (eds), The European Court of Human Rights between Law and Politics (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2011).
    3. Krisch N. ‘The Open Architecture of European Human Rights Law’ (2008) 71 MLR 183.
    4. Krisch N. Beyond Constitutionalism: The Pluralist Structure of Postnational Law (Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2010).
    5. Lock T. ‘EU Accession to the ECHR: Implications for Judicial Review in Strasbourg’ (2010) 35 European Law Review 777 at 797–98; and P De Hert and F Korenica, ‘The Doctrine of Equivalent Protection: Its Life and Legitimacy before and after the European Union’s Accession to the European Convention on Human Rights’ (2012) 13 German Law Journal 874 (arguing, in a somewhat different vein, that the doctrine may persist rationae materiae even if formally abandoned).
    6. Mahoney P. ‘Marvellous Richness of Diversity or Invidious Cultural Relativism?’ (1998) 19 Human Rights Law Journal 1, 6.
    7. Scheeck L. ‘Diplomatic Intrusions, Dialogues and Fragile Equilibriums: The European Court as a Constitutional Actor of the European Union’ in Christoffersen and Madsen (n 6).
    "
logo

Другие работы